In-House Anesthesia and Interventional Radiology Technologist Support Optimize Mechanical Thrombectomy Workflow after Hours.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prior literature suggests after-hours delay leads to poor functional outcomes in stroke patients undergoing thrombectomy. We aimed to evaluate the impact of time of presentation on mechanical thrombectomy (MT) metrics and its association with long-term functional outcome in an Interventional Radiology (IR) suite equipped operating room (OR) setting. METHODS: Retrospective review of prospectively maintained database on all stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy between January 2015 and December 2018 at our CSC. Work hours were defined by official OR work hours (Monday-Friday 7 AM and 5 PM) and after-hours as between 5 PM and 7 AM during weekdays and weekends as well as official hospital holidays. Primary outcome was 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Secondary outcomes included door to groin puncture time and procedural complications. RESULTS: A total of 315 patients were included in the analyses. 209 (66.4%) received mechanical thrombectomy after hours and 106 (33.6%) during work hours. There was no difference in the shift distribution of functional outcome on the mRS at 90 days (OR: 1.14, CI: 0.72-1.78, p=0.58) and the percentage of patients achieving functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days (43.1% vs. 41.3%; p=0.83) between the after hour and work hour groups respectively. Similarly, there was no difference in median door to groin times and procedural complications among both groups, with significant year on year improvement in overall time metrics. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that undergoing MT during off-hours had similar functional outcomes when compared to MT during working hours in an OR setting. The after-hours deleterious effect might disappear when MT is performed in a system with 24-hours in-house Anesthesia and IR tech services.

Zero-fluoroscopy approach for ablation of supraventricular tachycardia using the Ensite NavX system: a multicenter experience.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping systems have demonstrated a significant reduction in radiation exposure during radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures. We aimed to investigate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of a completely zero-fluoroscopy approach for catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia using the Ensite NavX navigation system compared with a conventional fluoroscopy approach. METHODS: A multicenter prospective non-randomized registry study was performed in seven centers from January 2013 to February 2018. Consecutive patients referred for catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia were assigned either to a completely zero-fluoroscopic approach (ZF) or conventional fluoroscopy approach (CF) according to the operator's preference. Patients with atrial tachycardia were excluded. RESULTS: Totally, 1020 patients were enrolled in ZF group; 2040 patients ablated by CF approach were selected for controls. There was no significant difference between the zero-fluoroscopy group and conventional fluoroscopy group as to procedure time (60.3 ± 20.3 vs. 59.7 ± 22.6 min, P = 0.90), immediate success rate of procedure (98.8% vs. 99.2%, P = 0.22), arrhythmia recurrence (0.4% vs. 0.5%, P = 0.85), total success rate of procedure (98.4% vs. 98.8%, P = 0.39) or complications (1.1% vs. 1.5%, P = 0.41). Compared with the conventional fluoroscopy approach, the zero-fluoroscopy approach provided similar outcomes without compromising the safety or efficacy of the procedure. CONCLUSION: The completely zero-fluoroscopy approach demonstrated safety and efficacy comparable to a conventional fluoroscopy approach for catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia, and mitigated radiation exposure to both patients and operators. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03042078; first registered February 3, 2017; retrospectively registered.

Electrogram-only guided approach to His bundle pacing with minimal fluoroscopy: A single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: His bundle pacing (HBP) is the most physiological pacing. The standard technique based on fluoroscopic approach might be challenging and fluoro consuming. Targeting the His guided exclusively by the electrical signals could enable a precise lead implant, thus reducing fluoroscopy time (FT) and X-ray dose, desirable both for patients and operators. The aim of the study is to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety both acutely and at 30 days of the electrogram (EGM)-guided HBP with minimal or no fluoroscopy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between October and December 2018, 41 consecutive patients underwent EGM-guided HBP. Successful HBP was obtained in 39 (95%) patients, (30 males, 78 ± 10 years). Selective HBP (S-HBP) was achieved in 23 (59%), nonselective HBP (NS-HBP) in 16 (41%) patients. The final HBP lead position was reached in 31 (79.4%) patients without fluoroscopy, only guided by electrical signals. In eight patients a minimal fluoroscopy (mean, 8 seconds) has been required. The sheath's cutting and the slack of the lead were routinely performed under fluoroscopy. No difference was observed in FT for HBP lead placement in S-HBP and NS-HBP (mean, 8.1 ± 25 vs 7.5 ± 20 seconds, P = .8; median value 0 vs 0 seconds). No differences were observed in FT for the entire procedure, total dose area product and total procedural time in S-HBP and NS-HBP. Lead dislodgement occurred in one (2.6%) patient 1 day after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: HBP could be performed safely and efficiently using the EGMs, with minimal or no fluoroscopy. Fluoroscopy was required during sheath removal and atrial lead placement.

Fluoroscopy reduction during device implantation by using three-dimensional navigation. A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The use of nonfluoroscopic three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping (3DM) systems reduces radiation exposure during ablation procedures. In this study, we sought to determine the value of 3DM during routine device implant procedures. METHODS: Seventy nonselected patients underwent implantation of a single chamber, dual chamber, or biventricular device guided by Ensite (Abbott Laboratories) to limit fluoroscopy use and compared with 70 consecutive patients, who underwent matching procedures with standard fluoroscopy use (FL) in the period immediately preceding the use of 3DM. The venous anatomy, right atrium, and ventricle and coronary sinus were mapped with 0.035 inch J-wire, quadripolar catheter, and/or angioplasty wire. The leads were advanced under real-time visualization in Ensite. RESULTS: 3DM reduced both fluoroscopy time and dose. Median fluoroscopy time for FL vs 3DM was 5.5 minutes (interquartile range [IQR]: 3.8-8.1) vs 0.9 minutes (IQR: 0.6-1.9) (P < .001) for single chamber devices, 6.3 minutes (IQR: 5.1-7.9) vs 3.3 minutes (IQR: 1.9-4) (P < .001) for dual-chamber devices, and 28.6 minutes (IQR: 19.6-36.2) to 14.7 minutes (IQR: 10.4-22.3) (P = .009) for biventricular devices, respectively. The median air kerma for FL vs 3DM was 15.4 mGy (IQR: 8.1-30.2) vs 4 mGy (IQR: 1.8-8) (P < .001) for single chamber devices, 16 mGy (IQR: 12-18.5) to 9.4 mGy (IQR: 7.5-11.3) (P = .001) for dual-chamber devices, and 324 mGy (IQR: 143-668.7) to 115 mGy (IQR:77-204) (P = .014) for biventricular devices, respectively. There were no procedural complications. At 3-month follow-up, there was no difference in voltage threshold measurements between the groups. CONCLUSION: The use of 3DM leads to significantly reduced fluoroscopy time and fluoroscopy dose during routine device implantation.

From near-zero to zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation procedures.

AIMS: The use of electroanatomical mapping (EAM) systems can reduce radiation exposure (RX) and it can also completely eliminate the use of RX. Radiation exposure related to conventional radiofrequency ablation procedures can have a stochastic and deterministic effect on health. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of an entirely nonfluoroscopic approach to catheter ablation (CA) using EAM CARTO3. METHODS: In 2011 we started an RX-minimization programme in all procedures using the CARTO system with the deliberate intention to not resort to the aid of RX unless strictly necessary. We divided procedures into two groups (group 1: from 2011 to 2013; group 2: from 2014 to 2017). The only exclusion criteria were the need for transseptal puncture, and nonidiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT). RESULTS: From a total of 525 procedures, we performed CA entirely without RX in 78.5% of cases. From 2011 to 2013, we performed CA without RX in 38.5% of cases; from 2014 to 2017, we performed 96.2% of cases with zero RX. The use of RX was significantly reduced in group 2 (group 2: 1.4 ± 19.6 seconds vs group 1: 556.92 ± 520.76 seconds; P < .001). These differences were irrespective of arrhythmia treatment. There were no differences between the two groups in acute success, complications, or duration of procedures. CONCLUSION: CA of supraventricular tachycardia and VT entirely without RX, guided by the CARTO system, is safe, feasible, and effective. After an adequate learning curve, CA can be performed entirely without RX.

Cerebral arterial air embolism after computed tomography-guided hook-wire localization of a pulmonary nodule: A case report.

RATIONALE: Cranial arterial air embolism is a rare but potentially fatal complication after computed tomography (CT)-guided pulmonary interventions. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 64-year-old man was diagnosed with a pulmonary nodule (diameter: approximately 1 cm) in the right lower lobe. The patient developed convulsions after CT-guided hook-wire localization. DIAGNOSIS: Cranial CT revealed arborizing/linearly distributed gas in the territory of the right middle cerebral artery. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was administered hyperbaric oxygen, antiplatelet aggregation therapy, and dehydration treatment. OUTCOMES: Clinical death occurred 55 hours after air embolism. LESSONS: Systemic air embolism is a serious complication of lung puncture. Clinicians should improve their understanding of this complication and remain vigilant against air embolism.

Low Fluoroscopy Permanent His Bundle Pacing Using Electroanatomic Mapping: A Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: Conventional permanent His Bundle pacing (PHBP) can be challenging and associated with high fluoroscopy exposure. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of performing low fluoroscopy PHBP using 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping and comparing outcomes with conventional fluoroscopy guided PHBP implants. METHODS: PHBP was performed at 2 centers using electroanatomic mapping-guided low fluoroscopy implantation in 10 patients using a novel protocol (group 1) and conventional fluoroscopy guided implantation in 20 patients (group 2). The primary end point was feasibility of achieving PHBP with low/zero fluoroscopy and safety end points included total radiation exposure (fluoroscopy time and dose area product), procedure-related complications associated with lead implantation or need for lead revisions. RESULTS: PHBP was successful in 9 of 10 patients (90%) in group 1 and 100% successful in the group 2 patients. The mean His lead fluoroscopy time was significantly lower in group 1 (0.2±0.2 minutes) compared with 8±7 minutes in group 2 ( P=0.002) as was the total fluoroscopy time (0.8±0.3 versus 13±8 minutes, P=0.003) and the dose area product (96±83 versus 1531±923 microGy/m2, P=0.003). The HB capture threshold was lower in group 1 (0.7±0.4 at 1 ms) compared with patients in group 2 (1.15±0.7 at 1 ms) P=0.04. There were no procedure-related complications or lead dislodgements in either group. There was an increase in HB capture threshold in 1 patient (5%) in group 2 at 1-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Electroanatomic mapping-guided PHBP is feasible can be performed safely and results in a significant reduction in fluoroscopy duration and exposure.

Feasibility of zero or near zero fluoroscopy during catheter ablation procedures.

BACKGROUND: Awareness of risks associated with radiation exposure to patients and medical staff has significantly increased. It has been reported before that the use of advanced three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping (EAM) system significantly reduces fluoroscopy time, however this study aimed for zero or near zero fluoroscopy ablation to assess its feasibility and safety in ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and other tachyarrhythmias in a "real world" experience of a single tertiary care center. METHODS: This was a single-center study where ablation procedures were attempted without fluoroscopy in 34 consecutive patients with different tachyarrhythmias under the support of EAM system. When transseptal puncture (TSP) was needed, it was attempted under the guidance of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). RESULTS: Among 34 patients consecutively enrolled in this study, 28 (82.4%) patients were referred for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of AF, 3 (8.8%) patients for ablation of right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) ventricular extrasystole (VES), 1 (2.9%) patient for ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT), 2 (5.9%) patients for typical atrial flutter ablation. In 21 (62%) patients the en- tire procedure was carried out without the use of fluoroscopy. Among 28 AF patients, 15 (54%) patients underwent ablation without the use of fluoroscopy and among these 15 patients, 10 (67%) patients required TSP under ICE guidance while 5 (33%) patients the catheters were introduced to left atrium through a patent foramen ovale. In 13 AF patients, fluoroscopy was only required for double TSP. The total procedure time of AF ablation was 130 ± 50 min. All patients referred for atrial flutter, AVNRT, and VES of the RVOT ablation did not require any fluoroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of zero or near zero fluoroscopy procedure including TSP with the support of EAM and ICE guidance in a "real world" experience of a single tertiary care center. When fluoroscopy was required, it was limited to TSP hence keeping the radiation dose very low.

X-Ray Exposure in Cardiac Electrophysiology: A Retrospective Analysis in 8150 Patients Over 7 Years of Activity in a Modern, Large-Volume Laboratory.

BACKGROUND: Only a few studies have systematically evaluated fluoroscopy data of electrophysiological and device implantation procedures. Aims of this study were to quantify ionizing radiation exposure for electrophysiological/device implantation procedures in a large series of patients and to analyze the x-ray exposure trend over years and radiation exposure in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation considering different technical aspects. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all electrophysiological/device implantation procedures performed during the past 7 years in a modern, large-volume laboratory. We reported complete fluoroscopy data on 8150 electrophysiological/device implantation procedures (6095 electrophysiological and 2055 device implantation procedures); for each type of procedure, effective dose and lifetime attributable risk of cancer incidence and mortality were calculated. Over the 7-year period, we observed a significant trend reduction in fluoroscopy time, dose area product, and effective dose for all electrophysiological procedures (P<0.001) and a not statistically significant trend reduction for device implantation procedures. Analyzing 2416 atrial fibrillation ablations, we observed a significant variability of fluoroscopy time, dose area product and effective dose among 7 different experienced operators (P<0.0001) and a significant reduction of fluoroscopy use over time (P<0.0001) for all of them. Considering atrial fibrillation ablation techniques, fluoroscopy time was not different (P = 0.74) for radiofrequency catheter ablation in comparison with cryoablation, though cryoablation was still associated with higher dose area product and effective dose values (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Electrophysiological procedures involve a nonnegligible x-ray use, leading to an increased risk of malignancy. Awareness of radiation-related risk, together with technological advances, can successfully optimize fluoroscopy use.

A Novel Technique in the Treatment of Lymphoceles After Renal Transplantation: C-Arm Cone Beam CT-Guided Percutaneous Embolization of Lymphatic Leakage After Lymphangiography.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous embolization after lymphangiography using C-arm cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) performed at the site of lymphatic leakage in patients with postrenal transplant lymphocele. METHODS: Between July 2014 and August 2017, 13 patients not responding to percutaneous ethanol sclerotherapy and conservative treatment for recurrent lymphocele after renal transplant were included. The mean age of the patients was 56.38 ± 9.91 (range, 36-70) years, and it comprised 9 men and 4 women. All patients underwent intranodal lymphangiography. C-arm CBCT-guided percutaneous embolization was performed in patients with confirmed lymphatic leakage. Patients who had no lymphatic leakage underwent drainage with fibrin glue injection. RESULTS: Lymphatic leakage was observed in 9 patients after lymphangiography, and they underwent CBCT-guided percutaneous N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate embolization. The volume of lymphatic drainage reduced to less than 10 mL in 8 patients. One patient who was not responding to embolization was treated surgically, after percutaneous drainage and fibrin glue injection. Lymphatic leakage was not observed in 4 patients after lymphangiography. Of these, 3 patients showed a reduction in the amount of lymphatic drainage after lymphangiography. All 4 patients underwent percutaneous drainage and fibrin glue injection. One patient did not respond to the treatment and was treated surgically. Prelymphangiography and postlymphangiography and embolization, the volume of lymphatic drainage was 113.07 ± 21.75 mL, and 53.84 ± 30.96 mL, respectively, and statistically significant decrease was detected (P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Lymphangiography and CBCT-guided percutaneous embolization procedures might be an effective treatment method for patients with lymphocele refractory to treatment.

Reducing radiation exposure during procedures performed in the electrophysiology laboratory.

INTRODUCTION: Expert societies recently published strong recommendations to reduce the exposure of patients and staff to ionizing radiation (IR) during interventional and electrophysiology (EP) procedures. However, adherence to these guidelines remains difficult and the impact of implementing such recommendations is poorly characterized. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a single-center cohort study to quantify radiation exposure over time in three EP laboratories at the Montreal Heart Institute during 5,546 consecutive procedures from 2012 to 2015 by 11 primary operators. Overall, 2,618 (47.2%) procedures were catheter-based and 2,928 (52.8%) were device interventions. Interventions to reduce radiation exposure included educational initiatives to raise awareness (i.e., limiting cine acquisition, patient position, table height), slower frame rate, lower radiation dose per pulse, collimation, and integration with 3-D mapping systems and/or MediGuide technology. An 85% reduction in IR exposure was observed from 2012 to 2015, with the mean dose-area-product (DAP) decreasing from 7.65 ± 0.05 Gy·cm2 to 1.15 ± 0.04 Gy·cm2 (P < 0.001). This was true for catheter-based procedures (mean DAP 16.99 ± 0.08 to 2.00 ± 0.06 Gy·cm2 , P < 0.001) and device interventions (mean DAP 4.18 ± 0.06 to 0.64 ± 0.05 Gy·cm2 , P < 0.001). The median effective dose of IR recorded per quarter by 282 cervical dosimeters on EP staff decreased from 0.57 (IQR 0.18, 1.03) mSv in 2012 to 0.00 (IQR 0.00, 0.19) mSv in 2015, P < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Enforcing good clinical practices with simple measures and low-dose fluoroscopy settings are highly effective in reducing IR exposure in the EP lab. These promising results should encourage other EP labs to adopt similar protective measures.

Radiation dose benchmarks in pediatric cardiac catheterization: A prospective multi-center C3PO-QI study.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to update benchmark values to use a quality measure prospectively. BACKGROUND: Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Outcomes Project - Quality Improvement (C3PO-QI), a multi-center registry, defined initial radiation dose benchmarks retrospectively across common interventional procedures. These data facilitated a dose metric endorsed by the American College of Cardiology in 2014. METHODS: Data was collected prospectively by 9 C3PO-QI institutions with complete case capture between 1/1/2014 and 6/30/2015. Radiation was measured in total air kerma (mGy), dose area product (DAP) (µGy*M2 ), DAP per body weight, and fluoroscopy time (min), and reported by age group as median, 75th and 95th %ile for the following six interventional procedures: (1) atrial septal defect closure; (2) aortic valvuloplasty; (3) treatment of coarctation of the aorta; (4) patent ductus arteriosus closure; (5) pulmonary valvuloplasty; and (6) transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation. RESULTS: The study was comprised of 1,680 unique cases meeting inclusion criteria. Radiation doses were lowest for pulmonary valvuloplasty (age <1 yrs, median mGy: 59, DAP: 249) and highest in transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation (age >15 yrs, median mGy: 1835, DAP: 17990). DAP/kg standardized outcome measures across weights within an age group and procedure type significantly more than DAP alone. Radiation doses decreased for all procedures compared to those reported previously by both median and median weight-based percentile curves. These differences in radiation exposure were observed without changes in median fluoroscopy time. CONCLUSIONS: This study updates previously established benchmarks to reflect QI efforts over time. These thresholds can be applied for quality measurement and comparison. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of left-sided accessory pathways in children using a new fluoroscopy integrated 3D-mapping system.

Introduction: Advances in 3D electroanatomic-mapping technologies have resulted in a safe and effective profile of radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation. The aim of this study was to evaluate a different catheter ablation approach in patients with left-sided accessory pathways (APs). Methods and results: From January 2015 to December 2015, 30 patients (median age 11 years, median weight 45 kg) with manifest or concealed left-sided APs underwent RF catheter ablation with a new protocol. All procedures were performed with the CARTO UNIVU™ system, integrating electroanatomic maps with fluoroscopic views. A 7 Fr ablation catheter was inserted into the right femoral vein and advanced into the right atrium. Geometrical reconstruction and activation map of the right atrium, tricuspid annulus, and coronary sinus were acquired. The ablation catheter was then inserted into the left femoral artery and advanced through the aorta and aortic valve, creating an activation map of the mitral annulus. Catheter ablation was targeted to the site of the earliest activation. No complications occurred. The median procedure and fluoroscopy times were 130 min and 6 s, with a median fluoroscopy dose 0.5 mGy. An average of two catheters was used. Long-term success rate was 97% (29/30) at a median follow-up of 9.6 months. This approach reduced fluoroscopy time, dose and number of catheters used compared with manifest or concealed left-sided AP ablation using CARTO 3™ (P < 0.05). Conclusions: This new ablation protocol seems to be promising in reducing fluoroscopy exposure and number of catheters used during left-sided AP ablation in children.

Carbon Dioxide as Contrast Medium to Guide Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: Iodine contrast medium (ICM) is considered to be gold standard in endovascular procedures, but its nephrotoxicity and hypersensitivity limit the widespread use. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is considered as an alternative for endovascular procedures in patients with contraindication to ICM. However, no studies have compared the outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) performed with ICM or CO2 among patients with no contraindication to ICM. METHODS: From May 2012 to April 2014, 36 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms underwent EVAR in a prospective, randomized, and controlled study. Patients were randomized into 2 groups, CO2 or ICM group. RESULTS: We were able to perform the proposed procedures in all patients in this study. There were no conversions to open surgery and no CO2-related complications. Endovascular material costs, duration of surgery, and time of fluoroscopy were similar between groups, and the cost of the contrast media was smaller in the CO2 group than in the ICM group. Among CO2 group procedures, 62.5% of the patients needed ICM complementary use. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CO2 as a contrast medium for EVAR is an alternative in patients with no restriction for ICM, with similar outcomes when compared to ICM, regarding duration of surgery, duration of fluoroscopy, and endovascular material costs. Using CO2, there were no changes in creatinine clearance and no risk of hypersensitivity reactions; moreover, there was a reduction in contrast-related costs for EVAR procedures. However, in our study, additional use of ICM to visualize the internal iliac artery was needed in most procedures.

Procedural outcomes of fluoroless catheter ablation outside the traditional catheterization lab.

AIMS: Non-fluoroscopic catheter ablation is becoming routine. In experienced centres, fluoroscopy is rarely required. The use of a traditional catheterization lab (cath lab) may no longer be necessary. We began performing catheter ablations at a paediatric centre outside the traditional cardiac cath lab in 2013. The purpose of this study was to compare procedural features of paediatric catheter ablation performed outside the cath lab to those performed within a cath lab. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively looked at patients presenting to the paediatric centre with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) undergoing catheter ablation outside the cath lab in a standard operating room (OR group). We compared retrospectively to a control group matched for age, type, and location of arrhythmia who had ablations in a traditional cath lab (CL group). Catheter visualization was exclusively by electro-anatomic mapping. Fifty-nine patients with SVT underwent catheter ablation in the OR from October 2013 to December 2015. Thirty-three patients had accessory pathways, 29 were manifest, and 13 of those were left sided. Twenty-six had atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia. Transseptal puncture with transoesophageal echocardiography guidance was used for 10 left-sided pathways, whereas the other 3 had patent foramen ovales. Procedure time did not differ significantly between groups (OR group mean 131 min, range 57-408; CL group mean 152 min, range 68-376; P = 0.12). Acute success was similar in both groups [OR group: 58/59 (98.3%) and CL group: 57/59 (96.6%)]. There were no major complications in either group. There was no fluoroscopy used in either group. CONCLUSION: Although performing paediatric catheter ablations outside the traditional cath lab is early in our experience, we produced similar outcomes and results without encountering procedural difficulties of performing ablations in a non-conventional setting. Larger multi-centred trials will be essential to determine the feasibility of this practice.

Safety and Feasibility of a Minimally Fluoroscopic Approach for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients With Structural Heart Disease: Influence of the Ventricular Tachycardia Substrate.

BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a minimally fluoroscopic approach using the CARTOUNIVU module during scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with structural heart disease undergoing VT ablation using the CARTOUNIVU module were prospectively included and classified depending on their VT substrate: (1) ischemic VT (IVT) and (2) nonischemic VT and depending on the presence of an epicardial access. Radiation exposure parameters and major and minor procedure-related complications were registered. A near-zero fluoroscopy exposure was defined as those procedures with an effective dose ≤1 mSv. A total of 44 VT ablation procedures were performed in 41 patients (22 IVT and 19 nonischemic VT). The use of the CARTOUNIVU module resulted in low levels of radiation exposure: median total fluoroscopy time and effective dose of 6.08 (1.51-12.36) minutes and 2.15 (0.58-8.22) mSv, respectively. Patients with IVT had lower radiation exposure than patients with nonischemic VT (total fluoroscopy time, 2.53 [1.22-11.22] versus 8.51 [5.55-17.34] minutes; P=0.016). Epicardial access was associated with significantly higher levels of radiation exposure. Complications occurred in 4.9% patients, none of them being related to the use of the image integration tool. A near-zero fluoroscopy ablation could be performed in 14 of 44 procedures (32%), 43% of IVT procedures, and 50% of procedures with endocardial access only. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the CARTOUNIVU module during scar-related VT ablation resulted in low levels of radiation exposure. A near-zero fluoroscopy approach can be achieved in up to half of the procedures, especially in IVT patients with endocardial ablation.

Evaluation of a new very low dose imaging protocol: feasibility and impact on X-ray dose levels in electrophysiology procedures.

AIMS: This study presents and evaluates the impact of a new lowest-dose fluoroscopy protocol (Siemens AG), especially designed for electrophysiology (EP) procedures, on X-ray dose levels. METHODS AND RESULTS: From October 2014 to March 2015, 140 patients underwent an EP study on an Artis zee angiography system. The standard low-dose protocol was operated at 23 nGy (fluoroscopy) and at 120 nGy (cine-loop), the new lowest-dose protocol was operated at 8 nGy (fluoroscopy) and at 36 nGy (cine-loop). Procedural data, X-ray times, and doses were analysed in 100 complex left atrial and in 40 standard EP procedures. The resulting dose-area products were 877.9 ± 624.7 µGym² (n = 50 complex procedures, standard low dose), 199 ± 159.6 µGym² (n = 50 complex procedures, lowest dose), 387.7 ± 36.0 µGym² (n = 20 standard procedures, standard low dose), and 90.7 ± 62.3 µGym² (n = 20 standard procedures, lowest dose), P < 0.01. In the low-dose and lowest-dose groups, procedure times were 132.6 ± 35.7 vs. 126.7 ± 34.7 min (P = 0.40, complex procedures) and 72.3 ± 20.9 vs. 85.2 ± 44.1 min (P = 0.24, standard procedures), radiofrequency (RF) times were 53.8 ± 26.1 vs. 50.4 ± 29.4 min (P = 0.54, complex procedures) and 10.1 ± 9.9 vs. 12.2 ± 14.7 min (P = 0.60, standard procedures). One complication occurred in the standard low-dose and lowest-dose groups (P = 1.0). CONCLUSION: The new lowest-dose imaging protocol reduces X-ray dose levels by 77% compared with the currently available standard low-dose protocol. From an operator standpoint, lowest X-ray dose levels create a different, reduced image quality. The new image quality did not significantly affect procedure or RF times and did not result in higher complication rates. Regarding radiological protection, operating at lowest-dose settings should become standard in EP procedures.